The National Impact of the Upcoming Presidential Election
America has reached a point where the government has become a weapon used against the people, to ensure persistent crises are invoked upon to distract the constituency from the atrocities occurring behind the scenes. Every action performed by government is funded using American tax dollars. The printing of money equates to an increase in taxes, alongside the simultaneous devaluation of the U.S. dollar. Yet throughout history there have been two factors to victors in any battle: (1) morally good is more powerful than evil, thus always succeeds (2) the citizens always prevail, no matter the morality of the ruler.
Citizens ought not remain divided; for we all are created in the image of God. Partisanship is a set of political beliefs; not something worth invoking violence, nor public shame. But America continues to receive divisive propaganda from the U.S. national government. Anything national will be extremely controversial, as nothing beyond money is universally agreed upon throughout every state. Even capital punishment, education, and health care all vary between states. Moreover, each locality bears its own cultures and traditions; often centralized through redistricting.
Republicanism stands to advance personal liberty and limit government intervention. Thus reducing government spending. For this reason, they weaponize constituents against the idea of civic autonomy, to ensure the cabal remains in power, making decisions on behalf of the people whilst funneling tax dollars to foreign governments to facilitate the persistent of international war. Democracy is a political theory umbrella term denoting multiple forms of collective decision-making. In its most favorable form, representative democracy ensures that delegates are elected to represent the diverse needs of America’s individuals. In actuality there are 535 voices of representation since 1913 (Under the ratification of the Seventeenth Amendment) when it was decided that America needed 100 more politicians to advocate for their needs. The reason this is so important is that these 535 delegates are known as Congress—the collective body responsible for spending out money and making laws. This American legislature is also the body that represents the needs of the American people. A continuation of this trend in the expansion of representation will bring the nation closer to a pure democracy; thus rule by majority. This leaves minoritarian interests (beyond war, economic, and administrative) neglected; producing a tyranny. Therefore to avoid despotism, it is essential to limit reliance on government, and rely on local government to interpret state laws, alongside broadly written federal statutes.
Therefore, the President’s primary duties include bureaucratic appointment power, commander and chief, and acting as the nation’s foreign diplomat. The president cannot declare war; that power is reserved for Congress. Nor can the president weaponize the military against the people. That happened under the Biden-Harris regime during Emergency Use Authorization during the SARS-CoV-2 coronavirus pandemic. But the President can control the Department of Defense (DoD); thus unofficially engage in foreign conflict under the pretext of a special military operation. Trump’s administration did not engage in foreign warfare, nor does he plan on the continuation of America’s current international engagement—NATO is no excuse for collusive foreign democide.
On foreign diplomacy, the preclusion of war, and the purging the bureaucracy; Trump has proven and remains committed to upholding the interests of the majority. These include: (1) ending assisting foreign conflicts; (2) granting the people more economic opportunity, rather than funneling money into welfare contingent on compliance; (3) regulating immigration to its traditional state. This does not mean barring immigration, but formulating better a process. Being a second-generation immigrant, it is clear the process to gain citizenship is specific and demanding. If some immigrants are subjected to this form of strict scrutiny, why should others be allowed to bypass this elaborate process—especially when their nation is not engaged in war, nor a foreign dictatorship?
As Jesus spoke to Saul before his conversion to Paul, “I will rescue you from your own people and from the Gentiles. I am sending you to them to open their eyes and turn them from darkness to light, and from the power of Satan to God, so that they may receive forgiveness of sins and a place among those who are sanctified by faith in me.’” (Acts 26:17-18; NIV). Sin is conducive with shame, even if it remains beneath our conscious focus. Faith produces positivity that, when prophesied, invigorates inspiration in others who witness it. America will prevail, and it is the obligation and duty of its citizens to get along, and stop persecuting their brethren for opinion. If you disagree with someone, it is likely that others disagree with you; thus judgment needn’t be externalized. Rather, self-reflection, and evaluation followed by focused action can remove the need for external and internal judgment. This is no easy task, but far less exhaustive.
In sum, November’s election ought to consider the actions of the past two administrations, and consider what conditions life was better experienced. Here, it is the decision of the citizen to take action against the Leviathan that strives to redact inherent liberties from the people. Now is the time for Americans to invest their voices in a manner conducive to prosperity unto posterity in American polity.