The Cost of Liberty
What is the cost of personal individuality? What is the cost of thinking for yourself? What’s required today is pick up your feet and let populism, political weaponization, and pharmaceutical propaganda direct your mind and physical decisions.
In America, individuality and self expression in modern times are confined to a cyberspace, where users digitally debate their belief systems from online justice warriors. These taboo topics include identity politics, trending propaganda, civil rights, medical privacy, and climate change.
What started with censorship of music and radio, has now extended to “alternative thought” and “individual liberties” in the modern age. Censorship continues to expand to unforeseeable terrain as the progression of suppression unfolds throughout our country. Today the “law” of accepted speech is written by the industries themselves, from Big Tech developing their own policies, to Big Pharma funding and controlling their clinical testing, and producing statistical analytics that define regulations individual rights in American society.
Is giving up your personal individual liberty just a small “temporary” inconvenience for your “security”, for “others” who are “medically unable” to take the “vaccine” really doing this “for the greater good”?
Did the coronavirus’s assault on humanity encourage financial opportunity, corrupting the science behind the data? With at least 70% of clinical studies being funded by the manufacturers themselves, who is responsible for protecting the authenticity of the vaccine statistics and their effects on humanity, and on the global economy?
Was the pandemic response an overreaction, and overreach, of government rule? Are vaccine passports a breach of privacy, and an invitation for medical publicity, an usher of new age surveillance? Are vaccinated Americans unknowingly participating in medical experiment, giving statistical contributions to further profit major pharmaceutical manufacturers? Who defines what is safe to put inject into our bodies?
Historic Deception
Throughout history, there have been instances of ‘mandated’ vaccinates, however in today’s modern age, propaganda and efficacy percentages from pharmaceutical clinical trials often overshadow over real world medical data.
Similarly, almost every major innovation held great reliance on propaganda to sway public opinion, changing the construct of society to financially work in their best interest. Even the initial discovery of electricity, and the ability to regulate it for profit, has fallen to deceptive propaganda.
In the 1890’s, inventor Nikola Tesla experimented with transmitting power by inductive and capacitive coupling using spark-excited radio frequencyresonant transformers, now called Tesla coils, which generated high AC voltages. Early on he attempted to develop a wireless lighting system based on near-field inductive and capacitive coupling and conducted a series of public demonstrations where he lit Geissler tubes and even incandescent light bulbs from across a stage. Nikola Tesla created the Wardenclyffe Tower. Telsa’s experiment would provide wireless power to the masses. Edison dismissed Tesla’s national proposition for wireless electricity, as Edison believed wireless electricity would be harder to regulate. In addition there was fear of hydrogen airship explosions due to electric fields. Nikola’s tower never succeeded into use and was taken down in 1917. In America, alternative treatments outside of the coronavirus virus vaccines are frowned upon. Similar to the decision of Thomas Edison’s claim to DC and his use of deceptive propaganda, vaccine manufacturers now compare the unvaccinated with their utopia of iatrarchy.
On October 11th, 1889, Western Union lineman, John Feeks, slipped while working and was accidentally electrocuted to death publicly in New York City. Thomas Edison used this instance to his advantage, advised America against the use of AC current.Thomas Edison routinely held public demonstrations, torturing animals such as dogs, cats, and horses, to prove his stance on the dangers of AC electricity. On January 4th, 1904 - Thomas Edison publicly executed an elephant by electrocution using AC electricity to justify his advocacy for DC. Thomas Edison, an innovator and scientist, was determined to sway society in the interest of his own benefit. Like Dr. Fauci, Edison was willing to go to great lengths to instill fear into the American population.
Could these same tactics be in place from major pharmaceutical companies, overhyping coronavirus statistics at the dawn of breakthrough medical technology? Could financial incentive be the determining factor contributing to these life changing decisions to what is considered acceptable within society?
Propaganda from October 26th, 1889 against using AC electricity. Similar to Dr. Fauci’s and Dr. Rochelle Walensky’s “pandemic of unvaccinated”, Thomas Edison suggested those who believed in AC electricity would be catastrophic to modern civilization. He made these false allegations to deceive the public, and profit from his rights to DC current’s invention.
“This is becoming a pandemic of the unvaccinated” - Dr. Rochelle Walinsky, CDC Director
The Scientific Pursuit of mRNA -
How necessary were the emergency use authorization concoctions mandated throughout our society? How much of the major vaccine rollout was fueled by the stakeholders’ and researchers’ opportunity to revolutionize the cutting-edge mRNA technology and capitalize on the forefront of gene altering technology.
Although public record states mRNA does not change your DNA, would an artificial increase in protein production from DNA due to a vaccine, constitute as a DNA change? Is change indicated by a permanent alteration, and if so, how can we determine the long term effects of short term DNA manipulation?
Conclusion
Whether you think you do or don’t, you still have a chance to make your own decisions, despite surveillance, suppression, and modernized propaganda. In today’s age, questioning the system of control leads to identity censorship, effectively depleting resistant ideas from the social grid of our country.
Is the restriction of individual viewpoints evidence of nefarious intent and tyrannical oppression? If coronavirus vaccines are so powerful and effective, why must society cater to people who choose to resist surrendering their rights to the state? Why has speaking out against the narrative become so taboo? Will society wake up before it’s too late, and realize what America has willingly become a part of?